Council for Secular Humanism

Get Active!

Sign up to receive CSH emails and Action Alerts

Donate online
to support CSH

Free Inquiry

Subscribe for the
Internet price of
only $19.97

Renew your

back issues

Visit our
online library

Shop Online

What's New?


Introduction to
Secular Humanism

Council for
Secular Humanism

CSH Organizations

The Center for Inquiry

Paul Kurtz

Speaker's Bureau

Humanist Hall of Fame

Web Columns
and Feedback

Find a Secular Humanist
Group Near You

Field Notes:
Council Activities
Around the Nation

Worldwide Index of
Humanist Groups

Humanism on TV

Freethought Alliance


for Humanism

International Academy
of Humanism

Secular Organizations
for Sobriety



Contact Info

Site Map




Journeys to the Twilight Zone

by Farrell Till

Scooping And Copping

The Twilight Zone, where the children of Israel lived and worshipped their god Yahweh, was indeed a strange place. Perhaps the only thing stranger than this god was the legal system that he imposed on his "chosen people." On our last journey, we learned that Yahweh abhorred anything that was blemished, and so he had ordered all people with physical handicaps to distance themselves from the tabernacle altar, lest they profane Yahweh's holy sanctuary with their presence. Even blemished animals, especially those with crushed testicles, would profane Yahweh's altar if they were offered as sacrifices. Apparently it was easy to "profane" Yahweh in those days. In Deuteronomy 23:12-13, the chosen ones were told that they should "have a place outside the camp" where they could "go," and that they should take with them a "paddle" so that when they "sit down abroad," they could "dig with it and turn and cover that which comes from [them]." Well, that makes sense. With three million people wandering across the Sinai on their trek to the promised land, human waste would certainly have posed a serious sanitation problem. What better way to dispose of it than to require each person to carry a pooper-scooper?

But wait a minute. Just when we are about ready to commend the wisdom of Yahweh for revealing to his children the need to maintain sanitation in their camp, we read on in the text and find that the welfare of his people wasn't really the reason for this commandment. No, not at all. The chosen ones were to dig with their paddles and bury their excrement, because "Yahweh your God walks in the midst of your camp, to deliver you and give your enemies over to you; therefore your camp shall be holy, that he may see no unclean thing among you, and turn away from you" (v:14). So that was the real reason for this law. If Yahweh should have stepped in anything while he was walking about in the midst of the Israelite camp, it might have disgusted him so much that he would have turned away from his chosen ones. After all, if Yahweh couldn't abide crushed testicles, we can imagine how offensive he would have found an unburied pile of excrement. Perhaps this Yahwistic aversion explains why when the "fullness of time" came for Yahweh to send his only begotten son to redeem the world, he chose just to "overshadow" Mary (Luke 1:35) and then assume the role of absentee father, which, of course, left all of the diaper changing to Mary.

At any rate, Yahweh was very sensitive about matters that pertained to bodily functions. As already noted, we have seen that he just couldn't tolerate crushed testicles, and so this could be the reason for a peculiar law in Deuteronomy 25: "If two men fight together, and the wife of one draws near to rescue her husband from the hand of the one attacking him, and puts out her hand and seizes him by the genitals, then you shall cut off her hand; your eyes shall not pity her" (vs:11-12). Today, if a woman's husband should be attacked, she would probably know that a swift way to rescue him would be to administer a quick, hard blow between the attacker's legs, but that's today. Back in the Twilight Zone of biblical times, a woman dared not do this unless she wanted to run the risk of being known the rest of her life as Lefty.

For some reason, Yahweh said nothing about the opposite situation in which two women would be fighting, and the husband of one should grab the crotch of his wife's attacker. One can only conclude that Yahweh, in his inscrutable wisdom, considered copping a feel to be a much worse offense for women than men. Why is anyone's guess, but it could be that this law had something to do with Yahweh's abhorrence of crushed testicles. A woman who grabbed a man's genitals could very likely damage merchandise that was precious to Yahweh, but the risk of damage wouldn't have been so great if a man grabbed a woman's genitals. Certainly, there would have been no testicles to crush, and this seemed to be the thing Yahweh was especially sensitive about.

Like many other commandments of Yahweh, these that we have looked at on this journey to the Twilight Zone raise more questions than they answer. The chosen ones were to carry paddles with them so that they could bury their excrement, but they had with them large herds and flocks of livestock. So what about the excrement from these animals? Did they have to bury it too? Or did Yahweh consider a cow chip less offensive than human excrement? In a fight, a man's wife could not assist him by seizing his opponent's genitals, but what were Yahweh's chosen ones supposed to do if two men were fighting and no wife intervened, yet one of the men grabbed the other's genitals? Would this have cost the man his hand? If not, why not? Wouldn't damage to the genitals be the primary concern of a god who couldn't abide crushed testicles, so why would he care about the gender of the hand that had inflicted the damage? We have no answers to these questions, because we read nothing in Yahweh's holy word about what was to be done to men who damaged the genitals of other men. It just seemed that Yahweh had a low threshold of tolerance for women who were impudent enough to dare risk damaging male genitalia. It makes one wonder if maybe this Yahweh was merely a god that Hebrew men had created complete with their own male concerns and biases.

Nah! Why, in the Twilight Zone, even the mere thought would have been blasphemy. These are all questions whose answers will just have to wait until the sweet bye and bye.

news.gif (359 bytes) Join to Receive the Secular Humanist Bulletin

back.gif (1144 bytes) Secular Humanism Online Library


This page was last updated 12/04/2003

Copyright notice:  The copyright for the contents of this web site rests with the Council for Secular Humanism.  
You may download and read the documents.  Without permission, you may not alter this information, repost it, or sell it. 
If you use a document, you are encouraged to make a donation to the Council for Secular Humanism.