|
| |
Jihad in the Netherlands
Christopher Hitchens
The following article is from Free
Inquiry magazine, Volume 25, Number 2.
In 2003, at a conference held in Sweden, I was introduced to a member of the
Netherlands parliament. She was a woman of hypnotizing beauty named Ayaan Hirsi
Ali, who had become a star of the Dutch Liberal Party. Originally from Somalia,
she had fled her country of origin in order to escape from genital mutilation
and the real possibility that her family might sell her to a strange man twice
her age. Becoming fluent in English and Dutch and radiating charisma, she had
soon attracted attention by criticizing the refusal of the Muslim establishment
in her adopted country to adapt itself to secular democracy. (Who knows how many
brilliant women like herself are entombed for life within the confines of
enslaving and stultifying theocracies?)
Today, she is living under police protection. In early November 2004, her
friend and colleague Theo van Gogh was stabbed to death and then mutilated on a
public street, evidently by a Muslim fanatic. Mr. Van Gogh, a descendant of the
celebrated painter, was a filmmaker who had made a documentary about the
maltreatment by Muslim authorities of Muslim women in Holland. The film had
featured Ayaan Hirsi Ali, and a letter “addressed” to her was pinned, by a heavy
knife, to the chest of the ritually slaughtered Van Gogh. The man arrested for
the crime, identified as Mohammed Bouyeri, was further found to be carrying a
“farewell note.” (Apparently, he had hoped to die the death of a “martyr” at the
scene of the crime, but the humane Dutch police only wounded him in the leg
before subduing him.)
Both the open letter and the note are of extreme interest. The note speaks of
Tawheed, which is the current Islamic extremist abuse of the Qur’anic word for
“unity” or oneness against all heretics from Shi’a to Christian. This Salafist/bin
Ladenist tendency also employs the term takfir, an approximate synonym for
excommunication (and therefore slaughter) of infidels and heretics. The faction
grouped behind this Qur’anic concept is the most noxious and cynical of the lot:
its members allow themselves to consume pork and alcohol and consort with
prostitutes if they are on a mission to deceive and destroy the infidel. (This
explains the apparent “paradox” of the 9/11 hijackers who were seen cavorting in
a nightclub in Florida shortly before mounting their assault on our civil
society. It also means that the most outwardly “secular” Muslim might be just
the one to fear. My friend Andrew Sullivan may be a hopeless Christian, but in
discussing this special permission, awarded so generously to themselves by the
godly, he made a truly secular observation. “How conveeenient,” was the way he
phrased it.)
The open letter is full of lurid and gloating accounts, lifted from the
Qur’an, of the tortures that await apostates like Ayaan Hirsi Ali in hell. It
refers to her throughout as “Miss Hirshi Ali,” a mistake that has baffled some
observers but which I think is obviously intended to make her sound more Jewish.
The letter is obsessed with the Dutch Jews who are among the leadership of the
Liberal Party and makes repeated references to anti-Gentile and racist remarks
in Jewish scripture. Let’s admit by all means that there are such references,
but the ones cited by Bouyeri seem all to be lifted from a fundamentalist
anti-Semitic Web site that has falsified the texts it pretends to be
scrutinizing. Other evidence strongly suggests that his manifesto was written
for him by a group that sent him out to kill.
When the bin-Ladenist forces in Spain committed mass murder in the center of
Madrid earlier in the year, they did so amid a huge controversy over the war in
Iraq and on the eve of a general election. So badly did the Spanish government
handle the affair—seeking to blame it all on a Basque nihilist faction—that many
Spaniards were able implicitly to indict George W. Bush for the whole mess. This
social and psychic suicide was not possible in the Dutch case. Holland gave up
all concept of “empire” a generation ago. Moreover, it has since been the most
generous and multicultural society in Europe, welcoming not only its former
subjects from Indonesia but becoming a haven in general. And its reward has been
to be targeted by Tawheed. One cannot emphasize enough that the victims here are
not just secular artists like Theo van Gogh but people of Muslim origin who do
not accept homicidal fundamentalism. This is the warning that many liberals have
been overlooking or denying ever since the fatwah against Salman Rushdie in
1989. And it is spreading: even as I write this, a Belgian legislator of
Moroccan extraction, Mimount Bousakla, has been threatened with “ritual
slaughter” for denouncing van Gogh’s murder. Any thinking person can see that we
will soon be facing jihad on the streets of Germany and France and England as
well. A secret army has also been formed within our borders in the United
States, though its triumphant first operation did not alert as many Europeans as
it might have.
The Dutch are friendly and tolerant, but they do not like having this
mistaken for weakness. A strong and hard reaction of decided outrage has set in.
At first, the authorities misunderstood this. They sandblasted a mural that had
been painted near the scene of the crime, which featured only the words “Thou
shalt not kill.” (The imam of a local mosque had of course complained that such
a display was “racist incitement.”) But people are now rightly fed up with
having their own pluralism used against them, and the protest at this
capitulation was almost as strong. I myself think it was the wrong mural to
begin with. You cannot fight Islamic terror with Christianity, whether of the
insipid or the crusader kind. The original commandment actually says “Thou shalt
do no murder,” thus making it almost the only one of the ten that makes any
sense. But we do not prepare for murder when we resolve to defend ourselves and
when we take the side of people like Ms. Hirsi Ali and Ms. Bousakla in the
Islamic civil war that seeks to poison our society and enslave theirs.
Christopher Hitchens is a columnist for Vanity Fair. His latest
collection of essays, Love, Poverty and War, is out from Nation Books.
|