Homosexuality and Catholic Priests
by Vern Bullough
The following article is from Free
Inquiry magazine, Volume 22, Number 3.
The
widespread exposure of pedophilia within the Catholic clergy has led the church
to focus on homosexuality within the clergy as a source of the problem. It has
to be emphasized, however, that pedophilia and homosexuality are not the same
thing. In fact, only a handful of priests technically are pedophiles (sexually
involved with children under ten or eleven). More might be inclined to
ephebophilia, an attraction to pubescent and post-pubescent youth. One reason
for this higher percentage is the Catholic practice of encouraging very young
boys to enter seminaries and cutting them off from normal adolescent
development.
When it comes to homosexuality, however, a significant percentage of clergy,
perhaps as high as 40 percent, might be labeled "homophile." This
percentage may be even higher among seminary graduates since the 1960s and in
the seminaries themselves. I use the term homophile rather than homosexual
because, even though their fantasies and attractions might be for same-sex
partners, they strive to remain celibate with much the same effort as their
heterophilic counterparts do.
Undoubtedly the loving, caring, supportive idealized role of the priest and
the male brotherhood of which this role is a part is—and has long
been—highly attractive to many homophiles. The Catholic Church has long
recognized this. Throughout its history there have been periods of greater and
lesser toleration. In much of the medieval period, the concern about sexuality
was not about the secular clergy (those who were the priests and bishops in the
secular world), since until the end of the twelfth century they were allowed to
marry and have families. Rather, the issue was with the regular clergy, that is,
the monks, and also the nuns, who were not clergy. They follow a special rule
that has always demanded abstinence from sexual activities.
St. Benedict (c. 480-580), the founder of organized monasticism in the West,
was undoubtedly conscious of the homoerotic drive among would-be monks. He
stipulated that two people should be prohibited from sleeping in one bed, that
lamps in the dormitory should be kept burning throughout the night, and that
monks sleep with clothes on. Homoeroticism was widespread in the monastic life,
as indicated by the penitentials, homoerotic poems, and other writings. The
problem with monastic life was (and is) that it is very demanding and austere;
it is not to be wondered that many found it difficult to maintain over the
years. Often the hidden issue was same-sex relationships, but the administrative
structure of the church was much too fragmented to deal with this or many other
problems. It was not until the development of canon law and the extension of the
power of the papal hierarchy in the eleventh and twelfth centuries that
organized and centrally directed reform could take place.
There were regular denunciations of sodomists by some of the would-be
reformers, the most damning by St. Peter Damian (1007-1072). And it was more or
less standard practice throughout the Middle Ages to denounce suspect clergy and
antipopes as sodomites. Church councils are full of references to homosexuality.
The problem was compounded at the end of the twelfth and beginning of the
thirteenth centuries when the Third and Fourth Lateran Councils established
clerical celibacy as a rule, whereas it had only been an ideal for most of its
history. Still the "sin against nature," as it came to be known, was
an issue continually discussed in councils and widely ignored in practice.
The Catholic Church has always taught that people are human and that there
will be many failures in achieving an impossible ideal, but the biggest failure
of the church has been in not giving any real sex education or warning to those
in its seminaries of the potential lifetime struggle to preserve a celibate
life. Those heterophilic priests who fail to observe celibacy have as much
difficulty as their homophilic counterparts, but they probably have a more
sympathetic response from the hierarchy and their congregation when they stray.
The mass exodus of priests in the 1960s and 1970s who then married was not
matched by an exodus of the homophilic oriented priests, thus increasing the
percentage of homophiles in the church. The church has been so panic-stricken by
this growing minority that when the late Boston Cardinal Humberto Medeiros tried
to remove the Reverend Paul Shanley from his high-profile Boston street ministry
because of Shanley's repeated acts of pedophilia, he hesitated. Shanley, who
denied the charges against him, said the real problem in the church was not
pedophilia but homosexuality and threatened to go to the media with allegations
of homosexuality in the archdiocesan seminary. Shanley allegedly said that if he
went to the press the cardinal would have to fire many of his top priests. It
may be that Medeiros and other bishops so feared the exposure of widespread
homophilia among the clergy that this inhibited them from dealing with the more
serious problem: priests who had sexual relationships with children and
adolescents. Indeed, bishops may have felt that pedophilia and ephebophilia
constituted a minor public relations issue by comparison.
If there is anything to be learned from this crisis, it is that there
are—and have always been—a number of homophilic priests within the Catholic
Church. Their struggles to preserve celibacy are no less difficult than those of
their heterophilic counterparts, and neither group is much more prone than the
other to seek out sexual relations with minors. Because of the sex-segregated
schooling and the easier availability of boys to priests, it was the adolescent
boys rather than girls who were more often the victims.
Vern L. Bullough is a long-time researcher in human sexuality who has
received many awards, including the Kinsey Award, for his research and
publications. He is senior editor of Free
Inquiry and a laureate of the International
Academy of Humanism. Currently he is adjunct professor at the University of
Southern California and distinguished professor emeritus at the State University
of New York.
|